Alexander S. Vindman (1975- ) is an American foreign affairs specialist serving on the National Security Council as director for European Affairs.
Alexander S. Vindman Early Life and Education
Alexander Vindman and his twin brother Yevgeny were born in Ukraine. After the death of their mother, they were brought to New York in December 1979 by their father, Semyon (Simon) along with their older brother. They grew up in Brooklyn’s “Little Odessa” neighborhood. The twins and their maternal grandmother were in the Ken Burns film, “The Statue of Liberty (film)”. Vindman speaks fluent Russian and Ukrainian.
“I am a patriot and it is my sacred duty and honor to advance and defend our country irrespective of party or politics.” -Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman
— Evan McMullin (@EvanMcMullin) October 29, 2019
Alexander S. Vindman Career
Lt. Col. Vindman has served for two decades in the U.S. Army. He was promoted to the rank of major during 2008 and was promoted to lieutenant colonel on September 8, 2015. As an infantry officer he served multiple overseas tours, including South Korea and Germany. He is a decorated Iraq War veteran, having received a Purple Heart after being wounded by a roadside bomb.
In his role on the NSC, Vindman became part of the U.S. delegation at the inauguration of the Ukraine’s newly elected president, Volodymyr Zelensky.
Beginning in 2008, Vindman became a Foreign Area Officer specializing in Eurasia. In this capacity he served in the U.S. embassies in Kiev, Ukraine and Moscow, Russia. Returning to Washington, D.C. he was then a politico-military affairs officer focused on Russia for the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. In July 2018, Vindman accepted an assignment with the National Security Council.
He has been subpoenaed to testify before Congressional investigators on October 29, 2019 regarding his knowledge regarding his possible knowledge of a July 25, 2019 telephone call between Zelensky and President Donald Trump. He is expected to be the first White House official to testify who was actually on this telephone call that is at the heart of the impeachment inquiry, in which Trump is alleged to have asked Zelensky to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, who is campaigning for president. Based on his planned opening statement, obtained in advance by The New York Times, Vindman’s testimony will largely corroborate previous testimony from Fiona Hill, his former manager, and William B. Taylor Jr., acting ambassador to Ukraine.
An NSC Ukraine expert complained to WH lawyers about Trump’s appeal to Zelensky to investigate Biden. Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman will be 1st impeachment witness who heard July 25 call. “This would all undermine U.S. national security,” he will testify https://t.co/KNsC0Y4dJW
— Julie Davis (@juliehdavis) October 29, 2019
Alexander S. Vindman Personal Life
Vindman is married to the former Rachel D. Cartmill. Vindman’s identical twin brother, Yevgeny, is an attorney on the National Security Council.
Alexander S. Vindman News
Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman of the Army is a National Security Council’s top Ukraine expert. Twice registered internal objections about how Mr. Trump and his inner circle were treating Ukraine, out of what he called a ‘sense of duty,’ he plans to tell the inquiry.”
“He will be the first White House official to testify who listened in on the July 25 telephone call between Mr. Trump and President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine.”
Lt Col Alexander S. Vindman Trump Ukraine Call
“I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’s support of Ukraine,” Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman said in his opening statement. https://t.co/Pl9R9koTc1
— NPR Politics (@nprpolitics) October 29, 2019
Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman is an excellent veteran of the Iraq war who wants to inform investigators of the political trial on Tuesday that he heard President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian president to investigate one of his main political rivals and denounced him to a supervisor “said New York Times
This telephone conversation between Trump and Zelensky is at the center of the Democrats’ political trial investigation after a whistleblower accused Trump of requesting foreign interference to gather information about a political rival and the White House was trying to cover it up.
Vindman could be called before its appearance, as the committees issued calls to current administrators who have testified so far.
However, it is not clear if it is presented on Tuesday.
Uncertainty about Vindman’s planned withdrawal will only increase after former Deputy National Security advisor Charles Kupperman, who heard Trump’s phone call on July 25 with Zelensky, was unable to convene Monday.
Kupperman threw a new key in the democratic political trial investigation on Friday when he filed a lawsuit asking a judge to decide if he had to deal with the citation of the house and pointed out the White House’s stance that the investigation was illegal. Kupperman’s lawyer, Charles Cooper, argued that his client was caught between competing executive and legislative lawsuits and that the courts would have to decide before he testified.
Just a few hours after Kupperman’s absence, the House of Representatives president, Nancy Pelosi, announced that the House would vote on Thursday for a resolution that reaffirmed the political trial investigation against Trump and Ukraine.
Pelosi said Monday in a letter “Dear colleague,” that the resolution was not legally required, but Parliament would vote to eliminate any doubt about whether the Trump administration retained documents, avoided testimony, ignored duly authorized subpoenas that may continue to obstruct the House of Representatives. ”
… here’s the portion of lt. col. alexander s. vindman’s opening statement concerning the trump-zelenskiy phone call. pic.twitter.com/uZJaU3AhtT
— fake nick ramsey (@nick_ramsey) October 29, 2019
Why do house researchers want to hear from Vindman?
US officials previously told CNN that the standard procedure suggests that Vindman heard the July 25 conversation and probably played a role in handling the call log.
In addition to the questions about the content of this conversation, Vindman will probably press during the minutes of the appeal to White House officials trying to control the implications.
CNN previously reported that the confusion that occurred in the hours and days after the call and described by six people who are familiar with it is parallel and expands the details described in the whistleblower complaint.
Concern and concern are reflected in a telephone conversation that deeply disturbed national security experts, even though Trump now insists there is nothing wrong with his own behavior. And it shows a failed effort ultimately to stop the agitation of lawyers in the administration.
Vindman was also one of five Trump administration officials who were selected for a US delegation headed by Energy Minister Rick Perry to attend the opening ceremony of Zelensky in May, sent to Ukraine.
The denunciation of the complainants alleged that the president had degraded the delegation and ordered that “Vice President Pence cancel his planned trip” because he wanted to see “how Zelenskyy decided to take office.”
Both Sondland and Volker have testified before the House committees in the political trial investigation. Perry, who is described by some as a key element of US relations with Ukraine, has pledged to work with lawmakers to investigate the allegations of the complainant.
A source who accompanied Perry on this trip told CNN that they had never heard Biden in discussions or as part of the trip’s mission. According to the source, Perry travels regularly at the request of the White House.
Volker resigned from his post after being affected by the complaints of the complainant. Perry plans to cancel his position in the administration until December.
Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman will be the first White House official to testify who listened in on the July 25 telephone call between Mr. Trump and President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine that is at the center of the impeachment inquiry.https://t.co/fbZc3Dwbzr
— VoteVets (@votevets) October 29, 2019
Questions about Trump-Zelensky call transcript
Previously, CNN reported that almost as soon as Trump hung up, news of what he had said in the teleconference was distributed among National Security Council personnel, particularly his request that Zelensky investigate Biden. The request was cause for concern for some of its national security officials, who discussed with each other if Trump had crossed a border.
Initially, the process of transcription and archiving of the call followed the standard procedures for dozens of previous presidential talks with foreign leaders: the raw protocol was distributed to a small group of officials, including the National Security Advisor, the Deputy Security Advisor National, members of the Executive Secretariat and lawyers National Security Council.
From there, the Director of the National Security Council for Ukraine, Vindman, verified the accuracy of the document before sending it to the then National Security Advisor John Bolton and his deputy Charles Kupperman. At this time, the document would normally be marked as “restricted access” and would be transmitted as necessary.
But in a matter of days, a National Security Council lawyer, by order of his boss John Eisenberg, ordered Council officials to postpone transcription in the codified system, a former White House official said, despite the fact that He was there during the call. No encoded material was discussed.
“I was concerned by the call. I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen… This would all undermine U.S. national security.”
— Vicky Ward (@VickyPJWard) October 29, 2019
A person familiar with the matter said it was possible for Eisenberg to use the call log after his first call to the main CIA lawyer in the keyword system to “keep the record” because he realized that it was It could be a legal issue However, other people familiar with the matter said the measure had taken place after officials realized internal concerns and wanted to prevent others from reading the document.